CityPups
Dog Adoption Website
The Company
CityPups is a new startup that wants to help people living in cities find the perfect dog to adopt. CityPups aggregates adoptable dogs from local organizations and shelters. Once a user decides to adopt, they get sent to a third-party contact to start the process. I was provided with 10 user survey interviews and a persona with which to begin my design sprint.
My Role
My role was to run a design sprint quickly to test out a possible solution. I conducted the design sprint using a modified version of the Google Venture design sprint to accommodate for the absence of a team during the sprint. I synthesized and mapped out the challenge with the research provided, sketched out solutions using a crazy 8’s exercise, created a storyboard of user interaction with my solution, prototyped my idea, and tested 5 users on the fifth day of the sprint to validate the solution.
Type
Dog Adoption Website
Duration
5 Days
Tools
Sketch, Marvel
Role
User Research, UI Design, Branding, Wireframing, Sketching, Prototyping, Usability Testing
The Problem
Through research and interviews, CityPups has discovered that people living in cities struggle to find the right dog to adopt due to their unique needs in their living spaces, schedule and transportation. My goal is to create a solution that addresses the dog-seeking concerns of users living in the city and help them find the right dog to adopt using the CityPups website.
The Solution
Design Sprint
Day 1:
Understand & Map
Start at the End
Map of Challenge
How Might We
Target
Day 2:
Sketch
Notes/Ideas
Crazy 8’s
Solution Sketch
Day 3:
Decide & Storyboard
Storyboard
Day 4:
Prototype Solution
Prototype
Testing Goals
Day 5:
Test & Validate
User Interviews
Findings and Discovery
Next Steps
Day 1:
Understand & Map
Start at the End
Why are we doing this project?
To help city-dwellers find perfect dog to adopt
City-dwellers struggle to find the right dog to adopt due to their unique situation:
Living space
Schedule & Transportation
Outdoor environment and space
We want to increase adoption rate, make happier owners, and find better “forever homes” for dogs
Where do we want to be in six months, a year, or even five years from now?
Working with every shelter in the city’s nearby radius
Expand to other animals such as cats and rabbits.
How could we fail?
Mismatch dogs and owners with not enough or inaccurate information about dog
Increase rate of dogs returned to shelter due to poorly set expectations
Not enough information on dogs to get users interested
Not enough kind of dogs in inventory to create a thorough aggregate site
Map of Challenge
How Might We (HMW) Statements
Sprint Target
01.
Provide desired information for city dog seekers to make decision to adopt dog
02.
Make sure information is as specific as possible (user interview)
Ex) Yes: 5 - 8months old; No: Puppy
Ex) Yes: Needs about 3-5 walks a day; No: Average active level
03.
Allow dog seekers to filter and search for dogs with characteristic requirement
Day 2:
Sketch
Notes
Ideas
I drew inspiration from the two largest and most popular pet aggregate search sites, PetFinder.com and AdoptAPet.com. Both sites were similar in their basic function, but they had differences in the amount of information that was searchable and displayed. I also sought out inspiration for websites that fostered personal connections because the goal of CityPups is to connect users with a canine companion. I decided to explore dating sites and settled on Bumble because Bumble is famously known for having a platonic friendship option, so I drew inspiration from that part of the platform. A dog is man’s best friend, afterall.
Crazy 8s
I decided to use the Crazy 8s technique to brainstorm and generate ideas quickly.
For the Crazy 8s exercise, I selected the Dog Profile screen because it is a critical screen that determines if the dog seeker continues or discontinues adopting the dog. It is the screen where most of the pain points or concerns from the survey users and interviewee will either be addressed.
The presentation and amount of details displayed about the dog is the main determinant whether a dog gets adopted once an interested party clicks into the dog’s profile. Without sufficient or specific information about a dog, the user cannot decide whether this dog is a good fit for them.
Solution Sketch
From the 8 options I brainstormed during the Crazy 8s exercise and the inspiration I took from the pet adoption sites and Bumble, I decided to try something slightly different and apply the personal blog style look of the Bumble matchmaking service to the dog profiles. I believe Bumble, which gives users the options to find romantic or platonic friends, and other match-making services are essentially human companion finders, whereas Petfinder and AdoptAPet.com are animal companion finders. By adopting some of the successful features of dating apps like Bumble, I believe I can create an improved matchmaking service for dogs and human users.
The two pet finder aggregate websites Petfinder.com and AdoptAPet.com both had similar formats and displayed the dog’s basic information in a very dry and ordered manner. The two sites had photos on top and then text sections below. I felt the Bumble profiles displayed a person’s traits and personalities in a more humanized and fun way. The Bumble personality/trait sections were quirky and fun and showed a more animated and spirited idea of what the person was like. I would like to do the same for the dog profiles to help them get adopted as well as help the human users get a better idea of the dog’s personality to ensure a good match.
Day 3:
Decide & Storyboard
Storyboard
For the storyboard, I imagine the city-dwelling dog seeker would discover CityPups via Google Search for adoptable dogs nearby. They would then enter any search requirements such as age, breed, and search zip code radius, and browse through the search results of all the dogs that fit their requirements. As they search, they can also filter for more specific traits that, through the user interview and surveys, I found city-dwellers required in a dog. The user would click on dogs that piqued their interests and read through the dogs’ profiles until they find a dog they either want to adopt or would like more information about. The user should then click the contact button and fill out the message form to message the shelter and hopefully, once successfully connected, meet the dog and adopt their forever friend.
Day 4:
Prototype the Solution
Prototype
For the CityPups website prototype, I wanted to take the parts I believed were intuitive from my inspiration websites, which were AdoptAPet.com, PetFinder.com, and Bumble. My goal is to convey a personality with the dog’s profile and help dog seekers get a good feel for the dog they are interested in as well as any practical requirements they need from a pet dog before emotionally investing any further in the adoption process.
Home Page
For the homepage, I decided to follow the convention set by AdoptAPet.com and PetFinder.com and designed the page to have the typical left-aligned logo and horizontal navigation bar on top of the page.
I noticed the primary CTA and feature of the homepage of both pet search sites was a concise search form for the users to get started on their search easily and quickly. I believe that by making the form no more than three basic search inputs, it jumpstarts the users’ search without committing too much time to make several selections and decisions. The three inputs I chose were Zip Code, Age, and Breed, because I believe these are the most basic physical features. In a high fidelity prototype, I would only make the Zip Code required as I think this is the minimum information needed to begin a search query for a city-dwelling dog seeker.
Search Results Page
For the search results page, I chose to follow a typical product browsing page that ecommerce sites employ so that there was an immediate familiarity with the browsing process for users.
The search result page is formatted like an ecommerce website where the thumbnails of the dogs are the main focus, and underneath are the dogs’ basic information: their Name, Age, Gender, Breed, and Location. The Name is bolded and larger than the other information because I want dog seekers to think of these dogs as more than stats that fit their needs, but as a living thing. The top part of the page has a detailed, left-aligned filter bar and a right-aligned Sort feature.
I believe exact filter options would still need to be more precisely defined through further user research and testing in future stages of the project, such as home size needed, amount of time able to be left alone, and comfortability with strangers.
Dog Profile Page
I deviated from the typical aggregate pet search website for the dog profile page. For the profile page, I wanted to adopt some of Bumble’s features that I found gave the profile subject more character and life than an ordered list of facts. I broke the information up into four main sections: Basic Info, Personality, Story, and Adoption Info, so the information was easier to digest and decreased the mental load of the user as they try to piece together the dog’s practical features and personality.
I also believe having a big hero photo in each section will help users keep in mind the dog they are reading about and be able to create a more life-like picture in their minds of what this dog is like.
My goal was to make the dog’s profile less like an athlete’s stats page and more like a personal profile that the dog would have created for itself on an app like Bumble. Finally, at the bottom in the last section is where I decided to place the CTA because I believe to make a good match, I want to encourage the user to read through the dog’s entire profile before reaching out to the shelter to move forward in the adoption process.
“Send a Message” Pop-Up
The final screen in my prototype is the Send a Message pop-up screen that shows when users click “Send a Message” at the bottom of a dog’s profile. Again, I wanted to reinforce my goal of “humanizing” the dog, so while the user is composing their message, I designed the pop-up to display a large hero image of the dog to keep it in the user’s mind as they move forward with their dog search process. I also designed the form to mention the dog’s name at the top of the form in case the user has difficulty recalling the name when composing their message and to avoid the inconvenience of returning to the dog profile while trying to send a message. For the form, I kept it simple and only ask the user to provide their Name, Email, Phone Number, and Message to make the experience seem as easy as commenting or direct messaging on a social media app. (In a high fidelity prototype, I would only require either Email or Phone Number.)
Confirmation Message
Once the user clicks Send, I have a confirmation screen, so that the user has the feedback that their message has been successfully sent. At the very bottom, I placed a CTA for users to continue their search, and the link takes users back to their previous search query so that they would not have to restart their search and re-select all their filters again. Also, on the confirmation screen, I again placed a small avatar of the dog they are messaging about and added a little message as if from the dog. This is to keep my theme of a dog’s personal profile and make it seem like the user was directly messaging the dog itself. I want CityPups to help city-dwellers to start forming a personal connection with the dog through the dog’s profile because a key finding during the primary research, many users were more concerned with the dog’s personality and temperament than they were with the look, age, or breed. Moreover, city dwellers were more concerned with the dog’s behavior in urban environments than any physical statistical feature, which is why I think it is important to skew the profile page and search experience to focus more on the personality and feeling of the dog, rather than its breed or age.
Day 5:
Test & Validate
Interview & Test
The Users
I interviewed 5 people who have looked for and adopted a dog before. I conducted the test via Google Meet and tested the prototype by asking the participant to share their screen with me as they completed their task. I was able to see the participants’ expression while they moved through the prototype as I conducted the interview.
The Test
For the test, I used the 5-Act Interview technique. To begin, I welcomed and thanked the participant and gave them the brief I was tasked with. I then conducted a pre-interview with context questions about their experience with looking for and adopting a dog and what process they went through and how they felt throughout the process.
After the pre-interview, I introduced the participants to the prototype site and explained the limitations of a low-fidelity prototype because in my experience, participants get confused when a prototype is not completely clickable. I then tasked the participants to use the website to find a dog they would want to adopt. The red route was to fill in the search form on the home page, choose “Custard” from the search results page, and to “Send a Message” from Custard’s profile page.
During and after the task, I asked the participants what they had expected versus what they were seeing, and how they felt about the webpages. Since the prototype was limited and only had the red route function available, all participants completed the task easily and successfully, and the test was more focused on what feeling and thoughts the prototype evoked rather than the technical usage.
Findings & Discovery
01.
Four out of 5 participants had experience with either PetFinder.com, AdoptADog.com, or both. The one who did not had never adopted a dog before. The interface was overall intuitive for everyone because I applied UI conventions from pet search sites, dating profiles, and e-commerce websites.
02.
The participant response confirmed that the dating profile format made the dog profile more personalized, fun, and real. All of the participants commented repeatedly on how personalized the profile page felt and that it made the dog seem more real.
03.
The In-Depth section was received well. Most participants found the information concise, useful, but fun. I think it adequately addressed a lot of unique concerns that city dwellers have about the potential dog’s behavior and personality.
04.
Although the filter was not interactable, some participants found the filter categories confusing and did not immediately understand what feature of the dog was being addressed.
Next Steps
Filters?
The exact search filters needed would still require further user research and testing in future stages of this project. The core problem of finding a dog suitable for an urban lifestyle requires honing in on the search filters that city dwellers need and are not finding on other dog adoption websites.
Profile or Photography?
Getting a feeling for the personality of a dog will require an emotional trigger in the users, and I found that the format and wording of the profile page successfully engaged participants while eliciting an emotional response.
However, I also found that the selection of professionally taken stock photos were a significant factor in the positive response to the dog, and it cast doubt as to whether the profile design or the photography was the real emotional trigger. I would need to perform more testing with lower quality photos to discover if the formatting and wording was the key factor.
Quiz and Guide?
I believe there are also other potential features to help users find the perfect dog that can be explored at future stages, such as a personality quiz like “What kind of dog suits me best?” or a guide to help inexperienced dog seekers. These additional components can be added in conjunction to the current traditional search engine site, and differentiate CityPups from other dog search websites.